In recent years, many studies have uncovered overwhelming evidence that Ivy Leagues Universities and other selective schools have been engaged in systematic and continuous discrimination against Asian-Americans in the college admissions process:
order viagra Golden (2007)— The discrimination against Asian-Americans by Harvard and other elite universities was so severe that Golden dedicated a special chapter “The New Jews” to compare it to the discrimination suffered by Jewish Americans in the 1920’s and 1930’s. He stated that “most elite universities have maintained a triple standard in college admissions, setting the bar highest for Asians, next for whites and lowest for blacks and Hispanics.” He also provided various qualitative examples as to how Harvard and other elite schools use various stereotypes to discriminate against Asian-American applicants.
buy sildenafil citrate online Espenshade & Radford (2009)—Asian-Americans have the lowest acceptance rate for each SAT test score bracket, having to score on average approximately 140 point higher than a White student, 270 points higher than a Hispanic student and 450 points higher than a Black student on the SAT.
viagra without a doctor prescription usa Unz (2012)—The share of Asians at Harvard peaked at over 20% in 1993, then immediately declined and thereafter remained roughly constant at a level 3–5 percentage points lower, despite the fact that Asian-American population has more than doubled since 1993 as has the number of highly qualified Asian-American applicants. “The relative enrollment of Asians at Harvard was plummeting, dropping by over half during the last twenty years, with a range of similar declines also occurring at Yale, Cornell, and most other Ivy League universities.”
Sander (2014)— “No other racial or ethnic group at these three of the most selective Ivy League schools is as underrepresented relative to its application numbers as are Asian- Americans.”
The discriminatory practices by Harvard and other Ivy League universities have caused tremendous harm to students in the Asian-American community: stress/mental health issues, pressure to study more as the bar is raised higher; lack of trust in American institutions; self-identification crises; and fortification of racial barriers. For each and every Asian-American college applicant, such practices engender a feeling that, being Asian-American, he or she is somehow less American than his or her peers of other racial backgrounds, and he or she does not, and will not, ever have full citizenship as an American.
In its ugliest essence, such practices are remindful of the past discriminations against and exclusions of Asian-Americans, including, among others, The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882; discrimination against Asian-American businesses such as that discriminating against Chinese-American laundries that was struck down by the United States Supreme Court in Yick Wo v Hopkins (1882); the segregation of Asian-American schoolchildren in San Francisco’s schools in the early twentieth century, a practice that was ended only when President Theodore Roosevelt intervened at the insistence of the Japanese government; and the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. Shockingly, America’s elite universities, even today, are still violating the civil rights of Asian-American applicants on a continuous and systematic basis, and have been able to carry out their patently unconstitutional activities with little or no governmental interventions. It is imperative for the federal government to intervene in a forceful manner to protect the constitutional rights of Asian-American applicants from continued infringement by Harvard and other universities.
Detailed Evidence and Specific Laws Violated
In its federal lawsuit against Harvard, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. has provided detailed evidence which proves that Harvard has (1) intentionally discriminated against Asian-Americans; (2) employed racial rebalancing, a de facto racial quota; (3) used race to an extent well beyond its being merely a “plus” factor in admission decisions.
In particular, Harvard’s Holistic Evaluation Approach disproportionately penalizes Asian-American applicants by using stereotypes and racial biases during the admission process. Harvard’s admissions officers often unreasonably perceive Asian-Americans’ academic strengths as weaknesses. In addition, they unjustifiably give Asian-American students low scores in non-academic criteria.
Specific laws violated: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Fourteenth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution.
Exhibit 1: Trends of Asian enrollment at Caltech and the Ivy League Universities,
Compared with growth of Asian college-age population (by Unz)
Exhibit 1 shows that the number of college-age Asian Americans (and, we can surmise, the number of Asian-American applicants qualified to attend select schools) has risen dramatically in the past 25 years. But the percentage of Asian Americans actually enrolled (as well as, it is fair to assume, the percentage admitted) has remained constant at those schools employing a holistic admissions process that utilizes an applicant’s race or ethnicity in deciding whom to admit. Cal Tech, a school that does not use race as a factor in admissions decisions and puts more weight on academic credentials, has seen its Asian-American enrollment increase as the number of outstanding Asian-American students in the applicant pool has increased.
Exhibit 2: College Admission Rate by Race by SAT Bracket
(by Espenshade, Thomas J. & Alexandra Radford)
Exhibit 3: College Admission Equivalent SAT Score by Race
(by Espenshade, Thomas J.; Alexandra Radford)
Exhibits 2 and 3 demonstrate the breathtaking disparity in the academic qualifications of Asian-Americans and Black, Hispanic, and White students admitted to selective schools.
1. Students for Fair Admission, Inc.’s Complaint Against Harvard University, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts Boston Division, November 17, 2014;
2. Unz, Ron, “The Myth of American Meritocracy,” The Conservative, Page 14-51, December 2012.
3. Golden, Daniel, The Prices of Admission, How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges —and Who Gets Left Outside, released in 2007, ebook edition.
4. Espenshade, Thomas J.; Alexandra Radford, No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life, Princeton University Press, 2009.
5. Brief amici curiae of Asian American Legal Foundation, et al. filed., Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
6. Richard Sander (Author), Stuart Taylor Jr., Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It’s Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won’t Admit It
7. Gallup Poll, In U.S., Most Reject Considering Race in College Admissions, 7/2013
8. Tony Lee, Millennials are the most diverse generation in American history, and they overwhelmingly oppose race-based affirmative action, breitbart, 5/2014
9. Poll: 57 percent of Millennials oppose racial preferences for college, hiring, 10/2012
The Economist: The model minority is losing patience, 10/2015
YuKong Zhao, Stereotyping Asian-Americans: Harvard Calls It ‘Diversity’ But It’s More Like Racial Balancing, Forbes, 7/2015
Steve Cohen, The Secret Quotas In College Admissions, Forbes, 7/2015
Sara Harberson, The truth about ‘holistic’ college admissions, Los Angeles Times, 6/2015
Bella English, To get into elite colleges, some advised to ‘appear less Asian’, Boston Globe, 6/2015
KATE BACHELDER, Harvard’s Chinese Exclusion Act, Wall Street Journal, 6/2015
DAVID FRENCH, What Ivy League Affirmative Action Really Looks Like — from the Inside, National Review, 5/2015
Michael Pearson, Mindy Kaling’s brother: I faked being black to get into medical school, CNN, 4/2015
Joseph Pomianowski, Yale Law School Is Deleting Its Admissions Records, and There’s Nothing Students Can Do About It, New Republic, 3/2015
Yunlei Yang, Asian Americans would lose under affirmative action, Los Angeles Times, 10/2014
Michael Wang, Asian-Americans and SCA-5: Here’s why many oppose it, San Jose Mercury News, 7/2014
David A. Lehrer, Richard J. Riordan and Joe R. Hicks, Viewpoints: A step backward on higher education enrollment, The Sacramento Bee, 2/2014
Rohin Dhar, Do Elite Colleges Discriminate Against Asians?, priceonomics, 4/2013
S.B. Woo, Discrimination Is Obvious, The New York Times, 12/2012
RICHARD SANDER AND STUART TAYLOR JR, The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action, 10/2012, http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/10/the-painful-truth-about-affirmative-action/263122/
Kevin Kiley, Think Outside ‘The Box’, Inside Higher Ed, 10/2012
Jesse Washington, Some Asians’ college strategy: Don’t check ‘Asian’, The Associated Press, 12/2011
Wu, Yi-Chen (Jenny), University of Georgia, “Admission Considerations in Higher Education Among Asian-Americans” American Psychology Association,